Posts filed under Notebook Reviews

Emergent Task Planner Review

etp1.jpg

Pens and paper can be an extremely satisfying obsession. The tools we use to write things down are available in so many unique forms that meet niche needs. Some of them are luxurious, while others are completely utilitarian. I love my tools, but when it comes to getting busy and planning out my days, I always come back to the Emergent Task Planner created by David Seah. Honestly, this planner has kept my cheese on my cracker more times than I care to admit. But while the planner is really good at solving the problem of scheduling my day, it also adds a bit of luxury that makes it delightful to use.

etp3.jpg

Before diving into the details about the quality of the pad, let me describe the basic purpose of this planner. First, write down the date. The idea is to use one sheet per day to keep everything straight and on task. Next, fill in the three important tasks that you need to focus on. You can write down up to 9, but the pad suggests against it in order to maintain focus. Next, there's a space to jot down the hours of the day, depending on when your day starts and ends. After that, start adding tasks, appointments, and other things that will happen during your day. There's a space in the lower right of the sheet for notes. That's it! It's an efficient way to plan out your day and respond quickly to changes during the day.

So what's so special about this pad? For one, the paper quality. The 75-page pad is printed on 80# paper, which handles most pens with ease, including fountain pens. It's not quite as smooth as Rhodia paper, but it doesn't disappoint either. I've used a wide variety of pens with this paper, and haven't found a bad match yet. It's fair to point out here that this pad is meant for small (ish) writing -- this isn't a tool that most people will want to use with a 1.5mm stub nib or a brush pen. The purpose of the pad calls for portability, speed, and versatility. Some days I use a gel pen, others I use a ballpoint. If I'm feeling fancy, I use a fountain pen. The EF and F nibs do best, while an M nib is a little too large for some of the fields. That's my only gripe, though. The quality of the paper doesn't disappoint. There is slight feathering with some nibs and inks, but no bleed-through. The feathering is difficult for me to notice, and this is a utilitarian pad, so it doesn't bother me. At the end of the day, the sheet is thrown in the trash.

etp2.jpg

This review is mostly focused on the quality of the paper, because I think it's exceptional for such an outstanding tool. It seems that most utilitarian paper products use cheap paper. I can't tell you if this method of planning is right for you, but I can tell you that it can stand up to most writing instruments you decide to throw at it.

You can download a free copy of the Emergent Task Planner sheet from David Seah's site to see if the format is right for you. If you decide you like it and become hooked (like me), I suggest buying some of the pads that David has made available on Amazon. The pad in this review is a standard 8.5 x 11" size. David also sells other versions of the Emergent Task Planner, such as a spiral bound notebook and a smaller 8.5 x 5.5" pad. David also has lots of other cool forms and tools that I recommend you check out.

Posted on October 31, 2013 and filed under Notebook Reviews, Emergent Task Planner.

reNote Notebook Review

reNote Review All.jpg

(This is a guest post by Garrett Kubat. You can find more from Garrett on Twitter @gazkubat.)

The reNote notebook is designed and made by Joshua Lepley of Intelligent Design Co.. I discovered these from a Kickstarter campaign that was used to allow for further acquisition of materials. I was drawn to these notebooks because they seem to be unique in that they are made out of repurposed materials.

In my case, one of the journal sized notebooks I have has a cover made from a soda carton, another pocket sized is made from a cereal box. This is something unique and I was also intrigued to learn that these notebooks were hand made by Joshua himself. There are elements of care and uniqueness in every one of these notebooks. They come in three sizes, a journal, a pocket and a wallet. I have found a use for the journal and the pocket but given that I almost always have a pocket notebook I don't have much use for a wallet.

reNote Review Covers.jpg

I'll give a rundown of what I think is great about them, and what I could see being a problem for some people.

What is great about them:

  • Very fountain pen friendly paper! You'll see in the comparisons that it performs much better than the Field Notes and the Doane Utility journal, although the Rhodia pocket notebook does perform better. This might be a bit unfair given that some notebooks are not made for fountain pens, but I consider this a huge plus in favour of the reNote.

  • Each notebook is hand made. Very few things are handmade now. If you watch the Kickstarter video you can see the process that Joshua goes through for each notebook.

  • The materials are repurposed. This isn't something that I see very often and view it as a huge plus towards the notebooks.

  • They are durable. The covers are from cartons that are solid and have a rigidity to them that I find to be great when there is no hard surface to write on. One difference is that the "Vintage reNote Journal" has a cover made from something similar to card-stock and would note be as durable as the others.

  • The journals are unique. Every single one I have is different. The covers come from cartons ranging from soda to cereal to chicken nuggets to beer.

What could be a problem:

  • Some of the typeface remains on the paper that is used. This doesn't bother me because it is a good quality paper and for the most part the typeface is minimal. There are some sections where it does take up a fair amount of the page.

  • The pages are blank. Some people may prefer grid, lines, dots, grid and lines etc. My preference is always towards blank or grid so this again isn't a problem for me.

  • They aren't perfect. The pages often stick out from the cover when the notebook is closed. This varies by every notebook but it is never to such an extent that I would view them as unusable.

Testing:

I didn't do anything to extravagant here given that I do not have an overly wide range of pens to work with. That being said I decided to be extremely cruel and use the Kuretake Brush Pen I received with a bottle of Noodler's Baystate Blue to see how all the notebooks held up under immense ink flow from a very saturated ink. I would say that for the most part the reNote and the Rhodia notebooks held up fairly well.

reNote Front

reNote Front

reNote Back

reNote Back

Doane Front

Doane Front

Doane Back

Doane Back

Field Notes Front

Field Notes Front

Field Notes Back

Field Notes Back

Rhodia Front

Rhodia Front

Rhodia Back

Rhodia Back

How to get them:

The prices and options are as follows. For my most recent order I contacted Joshua from his website and place my order by email.

reNote (standard cover logo) - hand assembled, staple binding:

Journal - 5.5" X 8.5" - 20 pgs - 2 pk - $12

Pocket - 3.5" X 5.5" - 20 pgs - 2 pk - $6

Wallet - 2" X 3.25" - 10 pgs - 3 pk - $4.50

Vintage reNote (vintage cover logo) - hand assembled, hand saddle stitched binding:

Journal - 5.5" X 8.5" - 20 pgs - 2 pk - $16

Pocket - 3.5" X 5.5" - 20 pgs - 2 pk - $8

Wallet - 2" X 3.25" - 10 pgs - 3 pk - $6

Having talked to Joshua Lepley a few times by email I can say that he is an incredibly talented and creative person. The products that he makes and is associated with all have the elements of quality but also care and an interest in how they can be useful. I really do enjoy using these notebooks because of how well they perform with a fountain pen. They won't replace other notebooks that I use, but they have found their way into the rotation.

Posted on October 17, 2013 and filed under Notebook Reviews, reNote.

Princeton Architectural Press Pocket Dept. Back Pocket Notebook Review

Pocket Dept

"Pocket Dept: A notebook for every pocket."

That is the tagline for a fresh line of notebooks designed and manufactured with recycled materials from Art House Co-op in Brooklyn. Being the fan of pocket notebooks that I am, I of course had to check them out when JetPens started stocking them.

As dedicated as I am to the standard 3-1/2" x 5-1/2" memo books I love trying out new notebooks, especially in non-standard sizes like the 4" x 4" Back Pocket Notebook. What looks like a stack of Post-its is actually a well put together, sturdy pocket notebook. In fact, I think it is too sturdy for back pocket carry. It doesn't have the flex of a 48-page Field Notes - it's more Costanza Wallet-feeling in my back pocket. Carry style aside, this is a nice notebook that I think works well in a backpack or purse.

Pocket Dept

The paper is standard all the way around, meaning it works well with most gel and ballpoint pens, while showing slight feathering and bleed with roller ball and fountain pen inks. Some work well, you just have to test them out to find the right fit. For example, my wider-nibbed fountain pens showed through to the back of the page. That is completely expected behavior.

One odd thing with the Pocket Dept notebook: It is made in China. There is nothing wrong with that inherently, but reading up on the product, looking at the design origination and the group involved in making it, it looks perfectly suited for a Made in the USA notebook. I assumed it was honestly. Not a big deal, but it made me say "hmmm".

If you are looking for something new to try and the 4" x 4" dimension fills a need, you will enjoy this notebook. For me, it isn't going to break into the regular rotation any time soon.

Pocket Dept

Pocket Dept

(JetPens is an advertiser on The Pen Addict and I received this product at no charge.)

Posted on October 7, 2013 and filed under Notebook Reviews.