(Kimberly (she/her) took the express train down the fountain pen/stationery rabbit hole and doesn't want to be rescued. She can be found on Instagram @allthehobbies because there really are many, many hobbies!.)
Since its release in 2016, Lamy Dark Lilac has been a beloved and highly sought-after ink. Aside from it being a beautiful shade of dark purple, it also had a bit of a slight gold sheen, which was quite uncommon at the time. Since it sold out pretty quickly, inkophiles have been begging, hoping, wishing, and praying for a re-release of the Lamy Dark Lilac ink and were shocked when they found it listed for sale on the German Lamy website. There had been no announcements made about the re-release of this ink, so people speculated that maybe it was a typo or maybe a tease of things to come?!? It also coincided with their annual release of limited edition Safaris, so maybe it was just being confused for Violet Blackberry? Turns out, it was a re-release of Lamy Dark Lilac, so everyone (including me) was excited to find out if it was the same formulation as the original 2016. TLDR/Spoiler Alert: it’s not the same because one of the ink components is no longer allowed .
There’ve been an abundance of posts and articles written about all of this, to the point that it made it to the New York Times (you need to be a NYT subscriber to read the full article.) Talk about mainstream news! If you’re interested in finding out more about this check out Aidan Bernal’s video as well as the series of #lamygate posts from FountainPenMemes starting with this one.
As a hoarder, I mean, owner of several bottles and cartridge packs of the original Lamy Dark Lilac (which I will refer to as OG or 2016), I was really curious to see how the two inks compared, so let’s dive right in!